Request Demo

NIST Risk Management Framework

What The End of The GRC Era Means for Risk Managers


Gartner predicts that by 2021, 50% of large enterprises will use an IRM solution set to provide better decision-making capabilities from a risk-centric lens and that the IRM solutions market will grow to $7.3 billion or more by the year 2020. But what does this mean for risk and compliance managers?

For most organizations, building an IRM program means blowing up all of those traditionally siloed off risk areas and replacing them with a single, holistic view of enterprise risk that business leaders get. 

Gartner defines IRM as a set of practices and processes supported by a risk-aware corporate culture and by enabling technology adoption that improves both decision making and performance by looking at quantified risk. Business leaders have realized the importance of risk and compliance standardization and the importance of the risk manager role. These risk and compliance teams develop and implement a solid risk-based program that will, in part, mitigate fears of CEOs and other executives... fears that their company might be the star of the next breach-based headline. 

Thus, to enable business leaders to truly understand the importance of risk mitigation and compliance, the idea of "Governance, Risk and Compliance" has phased out in favor of a new term: "Integrated Risk Management" - organizations are shifting focus away from Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) to IRM solutions. IRM goes beyond traditional, less automated, and compliance-driven GRC solutions to provide actionable insights align with business strategies and goals, as opposed to simply aligning with regulatory compliance requirements. Another important aspect of IRM is that it includes Digital Risk Management, or DRM. 

At its core, the move to Integrated Risk Management is a reflection of the shifting needs of today's enterprises, especially with the evolving digital landscape. New risks coming from new technologies, a large volume of new and complex regulatory requirements, paired with demands from the business have forced the GRC market to evolve. Today's compliance and risk management tools need to aggregate, integrate, and visualize risk data and bring in compliance status data to help support that risk quantification.

As a risk manager who is now speaking the language of, and aligning with, business leaders in their goals as well as yours, look both vertically and horizontally on how risk projects are done.

Vertically, this means risk managers and teams must link the overall corporate risk reduction and mitigation strategy with quantifiable business objectives. This way of doing things can be achieved by deploying specific risk mitigation actions across the organization in all departments with the support of the cybersecurity and IT infrastructure.

As a risk team member, you're doing a lot of risk assessments against, sometimes all, company assets. An “integrated” view that you could take across your risk management activities, therefore, can take on various perspectives from others. The legal, financial, and other departments may have their own definition of risk and their own mitigation procedures and strategies, but that legal definition of risk varies drastically from the way cybersecurity risk is being addressed. By using one, integrated and centralized risk management program across the enterprise, an organization can build a strong foundation from which to grow, adn risk managers can lead that effort.

You may also like

CyberSaint at RSAC 2019
on March 7, 2019

Day two of RSA and booth number 1641 is bustling. In fact, the entire Expo Hall is awash with new product announcements, compelling demos, and striking amounts of swag. The ...

Becoming Better At RSA
on February 28, 2019

Next Monday marks the start of RSA Conference 2019, where a projected 50,000 vendors and practitioners will descend on the Moscone Center in San Francisco. The theme for the ...

Digital Risk Redefines Enterprise ...
on February 26, 2019

For information leaders today, there is increasing interest from non-technical parties - from the legal team to the Board - in the ongoing question “are we secure”. The challenge ...

DFARS Cybersecurity Audits: What ...
on February 21, 2019

It’s getting real – the government is moving from self-reported compliance to external audits of a company’s cybersecurity posture: drilling deep to evaluate that company ...

Risk Quantification: It's Not ...
on February 19, 2019

Many vendors and organizations alike see opportunity in the nebulous realm of risk quantification. As we’ve seen before, risk quantification is nothing new to the world - dating ...

Why GRC Needs IRM
on February 15, 2019

Today, every organization strives to optimize the speed with which they access information. Data is being stored, processed, transmitted and utilized in almost every day-to-day ...

Alison Furneaux