Request Demo

It is the greatest challenge for a technically minded leader like a CISO to be able to map the information security risks that they know face the enterprise to the business outcomes such that business-side leaders can understand them. Dating back to the origin of the position, CISO’s have been charged with bridging the gap between cyber risk and business outcomes and key risk indicators are their secret weapon.

Key Risk Indicators

Key risk indicators (KRIs) are the tactical application of a risk appetite statement. For cyber risk managers, CISO’s among them, that manage cyber risks, cybersecurity key risk indicators are the listing of the benefit and the risks associated with that strategy.

 These KRIs are the marriage of the desired outcome that comes from the C-suite and the technical knowledge that comes from the security professionals that have been embedded in this practice for years and delivers value to both sides.

KRI's

Practically Applying Your Risk Appetite Statement

In order to effectively operationalize your risk quantification practices, the enterprise leadership must be able to understand and map those cyber risk metrics to the outcomes that they’re looking to achieve (otherwise why accept the risk). For technical leaders like a CISO, having the processes in place to facilitate the delivery of that risk data in such a way that its understandable to business leaders is critical - C-suite members and the board need key performance and risk indicators in the digital age and it is often the breakdown of communication that stops them from getting it.

Taking the high-level strategy of an organization’s risk appetite statement and breaking it down into KRI’s empowers risk managers to understand and feed the critical metrics back up to senior management.

KRI’s Give The CEO Room To Understand Cyber

With data breaches capturing headlines weekly, CEO’s are growing more and more concerned with the states of their cyber posture. However, this is a whole new classification of risk for CEO’s and BoD’s that leaves them searching for answers in ways that will fit into their current methodologies of managing existing and potential risk. With cyber-focused KRI’s that are constructed by the CISO in tandem with the strategy put out by the CEO, this helps the CEO understand the risks associated with the strategy - and either accept or reject that level of risk.

Using KRI’s as a means to empower both business leaders and security teams with an understanding of the other party allows both to work more closely and further integrate cybersecurity risk management into the executive leadership conversation.



You may also like

Cybersecurity Maturity Model ...
on May 1, 2020

Why DFARS / NIST SP 800-171? A few years back, the United States Department of Defense (DoD) released a new regulation, a Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, or ...

Dashboards are the Future of ...
on April 29, 2020

In today’s business climate, digital transformation efforts are becoming increasingly prioritized. As a result, we are seeing information security officers being consulted in more ...

GRC Software and the Impact of ...
on April 27, 2020

In recent years, the use of integrated risk management (IRM) as a methodology has become widely adopted to help orchestrate and centralize business continuity and functionality. ...

What is GRC
on May 6, 2020

Governance, Risk, and Compliance before GRC The idea of Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance (GRC), has been fundamentally integrated into the idea of how a business should ...

Cybersecurity Maturity Model ...
on April 23, 2020

The Department of Defense (DoD)’s Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) is the newest iteration of the DoD’s effort to protect controlled unclassified information ...

Tools for expanding NERC CIP ...
on April 13, 2020

Scaling the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) compliance requirements across an enterprise can be a daunting task. ...