Free Cyber Risk Analysis: Your Top Cyber Risks in 3 Clicks

Get Started
Request Demo

Practice vs Process Maturity: Strengthening Your Cyber Compliance & Risk Program

down-arrow

Information security maturity has never been more important. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the catalyzation of digital transformation and the ripple effects on businesses ensuring a strong cybersecurity posture and risk management program is essential for the new year. Too often, organizations will turn to technology investments to help enhance their security, however, as software development and technology has become increasingly capable, we are seeing that there is no way to use technology to protect against human error. Regulations are beginning to reflect this realization; with the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) being a landmark standard that incorporates the business process maturity model (BPMM) and practice maturity model when gauging the maturity level of a Department of Defense contractor’s security controls and programs.


Accounting for People and Process as well as Technology

As we move into a new year, organizations are still working to support the new enterprise applications that the pandemic ushered in. Specifically, security and risk teams have been working to update strategic business policies and procedures to support the rapid rise of remote work (a trend on the horizon but much like other trends accelerated by the pandemic, something no one saw becoming reality this fast). Furthermore, as digital transformation has distributed risk decision-makers across the organization, security leaders have been forced to take a risk-based approach to their business process management where historically compliance was a primary driver.

Practice vs Process Maturity

While we have seen standards like CMMC explicitly discuss the concepts of process and practice maturity, assessing and increasing the level of maturity on a practice and security process areas is possible using frameworks such as the NIST CSF Implementation Tiers. 

At its core, improving security maturity and transitioning from ad hoc/reactive security to proactive/optimizing security is the end goal through the incident response maturity model. Regardless of the security maturity model an organization chooses, the management and process maturity levels are essential to understand where you stand.

Watch the Webinar

 

You may also like

The Ultimate Guide to Managing ...
on July 19, 2024

Cyber risk management has taken center stage for managing and assessing cybersecurity. Security professionals who have taken a risk-first approach to replacing legacy GRC tools ...

Aligning with the NIST AI RMF ...
on July 17, 2024

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming industries, offering unprecedented opportunities for innovation and efficiency. However, with these advancements come ...

Tools for Empowering Continuous ...
on June 25, 2024

Continuous control monitoring relies heavily on various processes to ensure that cybersecurity platforms are effective and up-to-date. Regular audits and cybersecurity risk ...

June Product Update
on July 16, 2024

The team at CyberSaint is thrilled to announce the latest additions and updates made to the CyberStrong solution. These latest updates will empower you to benchmark your ...

How to Create a Cyber Risk ...
on June 10, 2024

In today's fast-paced digital landscape, conducting a cyber risk assessment is crucial for organizations to safeguard their assets and maintain a robust security posture. A cyber ...

Critical Capabilities of ...
on June 4, 2024

Continuous Control Monitoring (CCM) is a critical component in today's cybersecurity landscape, providing organizations with the means to enhance their security posture and ...