<img src="https://ws.zoominfo.com/pixel/4CagHYMZMRWAjWFEK36G" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;">
Request Demo

Practice vs Process Maturity: Strengthening Your Cyber Compliance & Risk Program

down-arrow

Information security maturity has never been more important. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the catalyzation of digital transformation and the ripple effects on businesses ensuring a strong cybersecurity posture and risk management program is essential for the new year. Too often, organizations will turn to technology investments to help enhance their security, however, as software development and technology has become increasingly capable, we are seeing that there is no way to use technology to protect against human error. Regulations are beginning to reflect this realization; with the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) being a landmark standard that incorporates the business process maturity model (BPMM) and practice maturity model when gauging the maturity level of a Department of Defense contractor’s security controls and programs.


Accounting for People and Process as well as Technology

As we move into a new year, organizations are still working to support the new enterprise applications that the pandemic ushered in. Specifically, security and risk teams have been working to update strategic business policies and procedures to support the rapid rise of remote work (a trend on the horizon but much like other trends accelerated by the pandemic, something no one saw becoming reality this fast). Furthermore, as digital transformation has distributed risk decision-makers across the organization, security leaders have been forced to take a risk-based approach to their business process management where historically compliance was a primary driver.

Practice vs Process Maturity

While we have seen standards like CMMC explicitly discuss the concepts of process and practice maturity, assessing and increasing the level of maturity on a practice and security process areas is possible using frameworks such as the NIST CSF Implementation Tiers. 

At its core, improving security maturity and transitioning from ad hoc/reactive security to proactive/optimizing security is the end goal. Regardless of the security maturity model an organization chooses, the levels of processes and management maturity are essential to understand where you stand.

Watch the Webinar

 

You may also like

October Product Update
on October 3, 2022

Hey, Jimmy - is it really always 5 o’clock somewhere? If not, it should be! With this release, we’re focusing on empowering our customers to work smarter, not harder. Whether ...

How Does FAIR Fit into ...
on September 26, 2022

The Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR) methodology breaks down risk into elements that organizations can compute, understand, analyze and quantify cyber threats and their ...

All-in-One Cybersecurity Board ...
on September 19, 2022

CISOs and Board Members can no longer ignore the importance of cybersecurity. New cyber attacks and threats surface every week and threaten the security of business operations. ...

Rules for Effective Cyber Risk ...
on September 12, 2022

Cybersecurity threats are becoming more challenging for businesses. According to PurpleSec’s Cyber Security Trend Report in 2021, cybercrime surged by 600% during the pandemic, ...

A Pocket Guide to Factor Analysis ...
on September 14, 2022

FAIR, short for Factor Analysis of Information Risk, is a risk quantification methodology founded to help businesses evaluate information risks. FAIR is the only international ...

Your Guide to Cyber Risk ...
on August 30, 2022

During the pandemic, online businesses flourished as people turned to e-commerce stores to shop from the comfort and safety of their homes. This unprecedented expansion of ...