<img src="https://ws.zoominfo.com/pixel/4CagHYMZMRWAjWFEK36G" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;">
Request Demo

DFARS, Cybersecurity Frameworks

Reading Between the Lines of NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 and 800-171B Drafts

down-arrow

On June 19th, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released the much anticipated Rev 2 of SP 800-171 and the working draft of supplement SP 800-171B. As the core part of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) cybersecurity requirements, SP 800-171 focuses on protecting controlled unclassified information (CUI) for Department of Defense contractors. For some contractor information systems managers, these are the minimum security standards and for some, SP 800-171 is bringing the organization up to adequate security to secure DoD contracts.

The Changing Landscape of DoD Cybersecurity

For especially the lower subcontractors, the DFARS requirements required the establishment of systems security operations to reach compliance. To date, DFARS cyber compliance has been a self-certification process, with representatives signing off on their compliance with SP 800-171 with little activity from the DoD to assess compliance. However, as we’ve seen, the self-certification model has proved untenable from a security perspective and the DoD is in the process of developing a new process that does not rely on self-certification. These new revisions, especially SP 800-171B are indicators of that shift. The supplement to the core SP 800-171 that all contractors must follow, 800-171B appears to be the first indicator or a tiered system between levels of security for contractors.

The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification

While we have yet to see concrete documentation on the DoD’s new certification, the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), CyberSaint CPO Padraic O’Reilly predicts that SP 800-171B is the precursor to the four-tiered model: “The SP 800-171B is a precursor to the upcoming CMMC that the Department of Defense is currently working on - this supplement, though, appears to be targeted at primes and high-level subcontractors given the specificity of certain aspects.” said O’Reilly of the draft supplement. The higher levels of the certification would certainly point to contractors higher on the supply chain while the more easily achievable levels are more focused on the lower levels of the DoD supply chain.

Where We Go From Here

NIST SP 800-171 V2 was one of the most widely anticipated publications from the National Institute of Standards and Technology in 2019 and given the changing tune of the DoD on the merits (or lack thereof) of compliance self-certification the DFARS mandate specifically related to the security of CUI is up for a serious change in 2020 and beyond. While the specifics are yet to be seen, Rev 2 of SP 800-171 certainly gives insight into the early stages of these new processes and requirements.

You may also like

November 2021 Product Update: Big ...
on December 2, 2021

  Gain visibility through expandable graphics and improved search filters!   "What is this? A dashboard made for ants? How can we be expected to report risk to our executives if ...

Kyndall Elliott
Why Your Cyber Risk Quantification ...
on November 29, 2021

Cybersecurity and risk management are essential to the success of an enterprise, but not all business units see it like that. Rather, executives and board members can see it as a ...

Enabling Risk Register Benchmarking
on November 8, 2021

Risk quantification has bridged the security world to the business world. By quantifying risk, security leaders have been able to frame cybersecurity in a business context and ...

Leveraging FAIR to Unite IT, ...
on October 29, 2021

Cyber and information security can be tough topics to digest. Adding on the element risk can make things even more confusing for those unversed in cybersecurity, leaving CISOs and ...

Modern-Day Cybersecurity ...
on October 22, 2021

A CISO is responsible for many things in an enterprise. They are in charge of establishing security and governance practices, identifying security objectives, enabling a framework ...

Aligning Security and Privacy ...
on October 8, 2021

For too long, companies have made the mistake of separating privacy and security regulation. This has led to numerous security gaps that cybercriminals have exploited and ...